Friday, August 29, 2014

Recipe: Pork-Roasted Babies for Baby-Eating Atheists


Yes it is true that atheists occasionally partake in a ritual of eating human babies primarily for all the protein and many vitamins and minerals contained in their young flesh. They make for a very healthy meal and the meat is always very tender and tasty. And for every human baby that is eaten we would have saved an innocent little piggy from a most gruesome fate. This should please PETA immensely. Besides, haven't enough pigs already paid their dues?

But let us not spin our wheels on the ethical implications of eating just one baby at a time from a pool of nearly seven billion. Instead, let us jump in head first to a very appetizing secret recipe.


It is often best to select an illegal alien mother's toddler-aged baby (anchor babies) who are often found lost wandering discount superstores like Walmart or at crowded outdoor flea markets. Anchor babies are preferred because an illegal alien mother will often crap out one or two babies every nine months to qualify for maximum possible public entitlements like food stamps, low rent public housing, and other forms of welfare. This often results in a near unmanageable nine or so anchor babies to easily lose track of by the time she is in her mid-20's. By snatching babies from such families time is on your side because you can be long gone before she notices one missing from her brood. This often occurs days later.

Be sure to choose one that is nice and plump but avoid those with full diapers. This is a sign that said baby may not be kept in the best of good health and thus, may not be very savory after roasting.

Benefits to Society

As an added bonus, most anchor babies come from Catholic or Christian families and grow up to be life-long tree humping, save the spotted owl, stop global-warming, save the world, bleeding heart, pinko pussy liberals.

However if you are not into dark meat but instead prefer White meat then give Jewish babies a try. The nice thing about this is that you would be doing the world a favor by eliminating babies who may grow up to be soulless, morally depraved Zionists who have no conscious.


First things first: Wash baby down very well as you would with any roast beef or pork roast especially its hind quarters. Do not gut the baby. This would be very cruel.

After cleaning is done place baby onto a large oven pan. The next step depends on your preferences. Generously douse it with cooking oil, your favorite spices, sugar and salt, and splash Tabasco Sauce in every body opening like its mouth, nostrils, ear canals, and eyes. This really adds a lot of flavor that will not cook out. By this time our poor little anchor baby should be screaming in agony. To stop this simply squeeze an over sized apple into its little mouth.


Do not cut up the poor baby. It is still a human being. Simply preheat the oven to 375 degrees and place the entire contents inside and close the oven door. Out of sight, out of mind. No noise, no problem. Roast 1-hour for every 5-pounds of flesh. After about two or three hours our delicious pork-roasted baby should be ready for a very special supper. They also make a great alternative to Thanksgiving turkey meals.


Our hearty meal goes well with any of your favorite hot side dishes or as cold cuts for tomorrow's lunch sandwich (see top image). Do not forget to invite your Christian neighbors for a unique delicacy but do not tell them what it really is. Just say to them, "It is roasted baby pork." Your special dinner is promised to be a big hit with them.

For more baby recipes please have a look at:

Legal Disclaimer

No animals were harmed in creating this recipe. The same cannot be said of the Jewish and anchor baby stand-ins.


Top image courtesy of

© 2014 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Ten Plus Ways to Go Full Retard On Facebook

10. Complaining when others occasionally tag your name to their post as a way of sharing it with many members. Such people are trying to start an intelligent dialog but you are too concerned about keeping your page clean to even care about the pressing topics on the table. Hence anal retention has come to be your natural condition.

9. Posting an excessive number of pictures of your friends, family, and children. Yes you have a very beautiful family but aren't there things you are uneasy about? This is a great platform to make your concerns heard and you are blowing it.

8. Yes you are a very lovely specimen but posting 1,234,754 "modeling" pictures of yourself on your page is a little bit of overkill. Please trust me when I say that nobody envies you. In fact they rightfully believe you are a narcissist.

7. Blocking friends or family because they post things that you disagree with. This should be seen as an opportunity to challenge their views or question your own. This is how we best learn from one another but you insist on being closed minded.

6. Have a verbal altercation on someone's facebook page and afterwards blaming them for not stopping it. You might even unfriend them for being incapable of knowing everything that occurs on their page resulting in not defending you.

5. Sharing cute baby or cat videos. Please trust me when I say there is nothing here that we haven't seen before.

4. Sharing mushy feel-good image memes. These always leave me with the taste of bile in my mouth.

3. Posting about benign political matters like gays right to marry, the practice of spiking our drinking water with fluoride, GMO's or pesticides in our foods, an attempt to teach "intelligent design" in public schools, etc. These are all merely distractions from the more pressing unjust public policies we should really be concerned about. Those in the mainstream media who control the narrative tell you to "look over there" and you foolishly do.

2. Sharing Ice Challenge videos. These are mindless and pointless. However I have one more "ice challenge" for you good people but I prefer to call this the "beaner challenge." Walk up to a crazy ass looking tattoo-d up vato in the toughest gang neighborhood you can find and ask him where the nearest Taco Loco can be found. Then splash his face with the hottest taco sauce you can find. If he does not pepper you with bullet holes don't forget to post it to facebook.

1. Declaring to friends and families how much you love and appreciate them. Oh please trust me when I say they do not love you as much. In fact they are more inclined to hate you.

Bonus 1: Changing your profile picture hoping that this new one will repair some of the damage done by your unfortunate DNA.

Bonus 2: Falling for those private messages where an unknown person of the opposite sex suddenly takes an interest in you and asks for your email address. It is a fact of life that no beauty will suddenly out of nowhere fall right into your lap simply because you joined facebook. It is far more rational to assume that it is a Nigerian conman attempting to harvest email addresses and other things from you if you are gullible enough to believe his pitch.

Bonus 3: Circulating petitions hoping things might change. The truth is that we were all conditioned to make phone calls, write letters, sign petitions, and participate in peaceful protests. This is exactly how those in power want us to respond to their unjust public policies because they are not threatening, carry no weight, and do not impact them personally. Congratulations! Your soft activism failed.

Bonus 4: Creating a new post with just a few simple words or an exclamation with no further commentary which would provide us with context we can relate to. We cannot read your mind. Therefore such posts amount to nothing more than incoherent childish dribble.

Bonus 5: This is similar to prior point. Posting images or videos on s facebook friend's page without any description or commentary to encourage us to view it. If you are too lazy to write a short narrative why should we waste our time giving it any attention?

Top image courtesy of

© 2014 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved

Friday, August 22, 2014

The Most Dishonest Three and a Half Minutes of Television History

At first glance this may appear to be about a dated viral clip and you would be correct however the points made are timeless so keep reading. You are not wasting your time.

This is in response to a viral clip of the opening scene of the very first episode of season one (2012) of HBO's The Newsroom starring Jeff Daniels, and created, written by, and directed by Aaron Sorkin (The West Wing). The video is entitled, The most honest three and a half minutes of television, EVER... For an extended version (8:16) please view this clip: The Newsroom "America is not the greatest country in the world anymore" 2012 TV series.

I quickly found over twelve uploads of this on YouTube with the most original upload having a whopping 7,981,813 hits. The others also had numbers to brag about but not nearly as high. Then there are all the direct uploads to Facebook and other video sites which may have also gone viral. Facebook uploading is how I was originally exposed to this. I think it may be safe to assume that most people sharing this were moved by actor Daniel's speech on "Why America is..." NOT "...the greatest country in the world" and likely agreed with most of his points. I must admit that I also felt this way the first time I viewed it a few months ago but it must have been at a late time in the evening when I was not very alert. However it recently found me again but this time I was ready for it. And that is when it hit me. This is well hidden in plain sight propaganda.

We were all being led and we had no clue. Well most of us at least. But then again the mainstream media has about a full century of professional experience at this therefore it is unfair to bear any shame for this. You get a pass this time but you better not let it happen again. It leads us by the strings by filtering what we may see or focus on and it influences our opinions by suggesting rational sounding one-sided views or appeals to our emotions.

In the clip Daniels' character lists many popular ideas on what America should or used to be but dances around those specific details which actually nail down what is wrong with America. Almost everything he lists such as class disparity and poor public education are symptoms of a deeper underlying problem. But I do agree that defense spending is out of control however this is also symptom with a root cause. I think we can all agree that the United States is owned by an oligarchy which is not content with having power over the United States. They likely want the world too but that is another story for another day. And yes this conspiracy theory has merit due to the mountain of evidence supporting this.

Our liberties are under attack by a whole arsenal of very potent weapons but Daniel's character fails to mention even one which are at the source of the problem. He could have listed a whole array of causes (sources) or weighing matters (symptoms) such as:
  • The Federal Reserve system and its failing dishonest debt-based fiat monetary system. That is the true source of the national debt which is now at over $18 trillion.
  • The Bilderberg Group and other very ambitious oligarch groups who successfully co-opted our government.
  • The emerging police state and police abuse to go with it.
  • The suspension of our civil rights (NDAA 2012-2014, Patriot Act, etc.).
  • NSA bulk surveillance of the American people and likely many other federal agencies also participating in this unlawful practice.
  • The suspicious construction of so many FEMA camps. What are they really for?
  • The government devolving into corporatism.
  • AIPAC (Israel lobby) heavily influencing foreign policy by essentially delegating who gets elected for two of the three branches of government.
  • The Zionist managed mainstream media which filters and slants our news. This is propaganda.
  • How regular entertainment programming deliberately distracts us from things that matter or reinforces certain principles not in our best interest. This is also propaganda.
Did you also notice how he reinforced the left-right paradigm? This is also a lie. The right and the left are two flavors of the same socialist party. Then there was all of the over-emphasis on freedom. This is also a reinforcement that the United States is still a free country despite our liberties being in peril as this government steadily marching us toward a New World Order that is a One World Government. All these are likely things that the mainstream media does not want our attention focused on. When a single cabal manages the media they control the narrative. This gives them the power to influence public policy to their advantage. With every new restriction on our liberties the more this resembles the red scare of the cold war.

If what we really want is to restore this nation to its constitution we must start thinking differently. We must ask ourselves if we really need the state to manage essentially the most critical affairs of society. Regardless of the good intent of its founders all governments grow to unsustainable levels because they are always hijacked by the most ambitious smooth talking crooks in any civilization. Thus the state which was founded to serve us becomes our master as it serves those who hide behind a curtain of secrecy. And I do not mean the politicians. I am referencing the CEO's of big business especially in the banking sector who step in as the oligarchs.

It is for such reasons and many more that I am convinced that we need to move in the direction of anarcho-capitalism else all of our liberties including our right to speak against the state will eventually be stripped from us. On many YouTube uploads (sample video given, also embedded below) and in a series of ingenious articles at (all articles on page, omit George Zimmerman) political philosopher and historian Stefan Molyneux (website) builds a solid case for anarcho-capitalism and why we must dissolve the state . If you are not yet ready for complete freedom in a stateless society there is an answer for you apprehension. Please give the Libertarian Party (videos) a try by viewing a short series of video clips which demonstrate how Libertarians would solve government created problems. I promise that in such a country everything I listed would no longer be a threat because they would all cease to exist.

For another point of view in opposition of this clip I recommend, Why the “most honest 3 minutes on TV ever” is a lie.

Top image courtesy of

© 2014 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

The Singularity That Can Impede All Attempts by the Public to Stop the Government


The author is in no way attempting to influence the use of force against the state or incite a civil war or riots among the population. This entire article is merely an analysis of the U.S. population's ability to stop the government as it recedes into a fascist police state.

First A Short Lesson From History

It is said that Hitler's motivation for committing one of the biggest blunders in the history of war was declaring war on the United States immediately after Pearl Harbor. What most people overlook was that it needed to be done sooner than later else the U.S. would grow too strong to defeat. Unlike what typical history books teach he did not have global ambitions but he was keenly aware that in taking Europe and the Soviet Union by storm he was inviting an inevitable face off with the United States and its allies. But were there other motives? Perhaps Hitler acknowledged recent events in his time as evidence of the U.S. having global ambitions. The time since the end of World War II sharply leans this way.

In every war history always proves that technology is a very potent force multiplier. Since World War I the U.S. had arrived as an economic and military superpower driven by technology, industry, money, manpower, and resources and the U.S. had plenty of all of it. It even had enough petroleum reserves to be a major exporter. All such factors compelled Hitler to strike at the U.S. when it was not prepared for war (only had about 150,000 soldiers and about as much armaments), when half its navy was decimated, and it was preoccupied with Japan -- else he may never get another chance because the United States would never be this "weak" again. Perhaps this was not a blunder but an unavoidable destiny. Keep this little lesson from history in mind as you continue reading.

Why Peaceful Activism Does Not Work

While we were all sleeping our benevolent government in piece-meal fashion quietly eased in the surveillance and emerging police state for our own protection resulting in no competent protest or resistance to stop it. The traditional modes of demanding political change like calling our legislators, writing letters, circulating petitions, peaceful protests, voting, etc. DO NOT WORK. This is exactly how they conditioned us to respond to their unjust public policies because it is not threatening, carries no force, and is very benign. Yet we all feel good about ourselves after participating in such pointless activism. A common worst case scenario of the government's inaction is the public resorting to riots resulting in harming their own community and its small business owners who have as much culpability over what the state has become as you or I. But even such adversity has absolutely no impact on our legislators or their benefactors (campaign contributors, plutocrats, lobbies, etc.) because they were not financially hit, they retained their political power, and the public is very forgiving and forgetful.

The cards are already stacked against us. The mountain of potential (time not working) and real (food, shelter, citations, fines, etc,) costs and hardships (arrests, police abuse, violence, etc.) faced by the public in pointless demonstrations just to beg for scraps of political change cannot be justified even if our legislators agreed to some minor concessions. Then we have the swiftly emerging police state whose armed agents face no difficulties and whose presence only has a positive effect on their finances as all are compensated for every regular and over-time hour they clock in while managing an angry public. This was just business as usual for them while the rest of us sacrificed in vain.

The "occupy" movement failed because of all the reasons cited and to add to the burden the public was not united although they appeared to be. They could not agree on what was wrong and how to go about peacefully solving it. How about protesting the emergence of the police state? Their overwhelming presence could not be missed. And even if they could agree on what was wrong and how to go about solving it, it would likely not have been effective again for reasons previously given. Perhaps we must face the fact the only answer to the government steadily receding into totalitarianism is resistance including the use of force -- what nobody wants.

The problem with our government is really us. We are the root cause. We are simply not mentally prepared for a campaign of determined resistance against the state. We are so indoctrinated that we still view the assassination of any political leaders as an attack on our own family even though these despots are not with us. It can be justifiably argued that they are the enemy. These are the politicians who may not give a second thought to direct the murder of civilians because they are seen as threatening the continuity of government or for national security reasons. Recall how many moderates and pundits from either party called for tagging Julian Assange of Wikileaks as a terrorist who deserved nothing less than life in prison or capital punishment even though he broke no laws. All cables were sent to Wikileaks, the publisher, and he did what publishers do best which is to publish. All this despite being an Australian citizen (not a U.S. citizen) and none of this occurring on U.S. soil. Have a look at this commentary by political philosopher Stefan Molyneux for more on this: The Truth About Wikileaks.

Thinking Differently Is Our Only Chance

If we really are determined with restoring the republic hence our liberties and our rights we must start thinking differently from what we were conditioned. Those courageous civilians who risk everything to eliminate a corrupt politician or gun-toting agents of the police state should be viewed with reverence despite their motives. Criminal courts are already biased in favor of police who are privileged with protections from accountability when committing acts of abuse which have resulted in the murder of innocent civilians. Yet when most people serve on a jury for a defendant charged for violent crimes against the police, a government worker, or a corrupt politician it does not cross their mind to protect them with all the power endowed to to them by the court. This is where most people have the most power to reign in positive political change. This is done by never convicting (a not guilty juror vote) a defendant up on such charges. This would send a very stern message to the police and the government that the people are now in charge and abuse by the state and the police will no longer be tolerated.

The Second Amendment was not included in the Bill of Right to permit citizens to defend against crime from other civilians. Its real goal was to restrain the government should it become necessary. At the time of adoption of all ten Bill of Rights (1791) the people and federal government were on equal footing as far as the defense technology available at the time.

A united civilian public with clear goals that were well planned can defeat the police with calculated directed force but the military would have to be dealt with an entirely different approach; We would need to appeal to their emotions which should not be too difficult for reasons about to be given. The police do not actually exist to apprehend criminals. Their real goal is to protect the existing class structure by managing the public. All this demands a cold dominant posture with us which keeps us apart from them. However in theory at least, the military only exists to defend the people and yes for national security as well which is really just a misnomer for defending the government. But they still view us as one of them. It is likely that some or many troops may not feel easy about firing on American civilians and they may be turned to defend civilians against other troops who are strictly following orders. Those which we could not turn would need to be challenged with very inventive and original guerrilla tactics in cities where surveillance cameras are located on every street and all our communications are monitored all the time. Yes we would have to be very inventive but its still possible despite their immense resources and technology -- at least for now.

But that is not all. Military Commanders are now being promoted based on their willingness to disarm the public. This is euphemism for "are you willing to shoot on American civilians" as this article suggests: Obama Asking Military Officers If They Will Shoot Americans. However even this is not all we would face. Our own government has already made the most treasonous plans to combat an insurgent public who our troops may not wish to fire on. As unbelievable as this may appear, Russian, Polish and troops from many other nations have been training on American soil. Why would the state train foreign troops (some who are not from NATO countries) to confiscate our arms with the goal of mitigating any revolt? The answer is very simple. Foreign troops would not hesitate to shoot civilians they do not consider their own. For more on this please view: Russians train to Disarm U.S Citizens on U.S soil.

The Singularity Is Finally Defined

Because of our docile nature (call it cowardice if you wish) and our inability to make intelligent decisions with our very limited resources and courageous and meaningful sacrifices which actually make an impact we may be quickly reaching a point of no return because of what I call the "singularity" of the state. This is not the "big bang" singularity but it is somewhat related to the "artificial intelligence" (A.I.) or technology (Tech) singularity whereby technology (i.e. robots, computers, etc.) will have advanced to where they are indistinguishable from human intelligence yet it will have superhuman intelligence and abilities.

A state singularity exists when the government has an arsenal of technology and/or proven public policies to defend itself (or remain in power) with force or with the use of other defensive methods which have advanced far enough to be beyond the ability of its population to restrain. It may be a collection of many non-connected systems working independently from one another but may be managed from a central location or authority.

How The State Uses Technology to Manage the Public

One glaring aspect of this that the public immediately notices is when it is used as a force multiplier by police or federal agents. This is when militarized gear is worn in the field to protect them and to make them physically stronger and likely more imposing and intimidating. They may be carrying automatic assault weapons under some circumstances. Military armored vehicles are now a common sight in police departments throughout the country courtesy of a very caring Dept. of Homeland Security. This is a surplus to what many departments already have which are small limited-use tanks equipped with a battering ram in place of the main gun which is often put to use for breaching "crack houses.". However the state singularity is not necessarily only used this way.

With the NSA, FBI, CIA, ATF, DEA, and many other not yet known federal agencies monitoring our communications they can now easily head off any attempts at stopping them. They can even target individuals who are regarded as trouble makers who have committed no crimes just to impede their activities. They may also be indefinitely detained without any charges ever filed or given a hearing or a trial (Patriotic Act, NDAA 2012-2014), harassed by the IRS, labeled a terrorists and put on a no-fly list, among many other things outside the law.

Moreover expect surveillance drones flying just over our heads to be a common sight throughout all American metropolitan areas including small towns. Technology is advancing at very high rates especially in electronics and microscopic nanotechnology. This means that drone technologies will soon be at a point where they cannot be seen. Such drones will not only fly into our homes just to keep an eye on some of us, some may even be armed with high tech covert devices which can instantly kill us (for example the CIA has a special type of gun which can produce what appears to be instant heart attacks) just to eliminate certain individuals deemed as a possible threat. And with secret surveillance drones in our homes it will be very easy to silence trouble makers without physically harming them by simply blackmailing them.

Then there is the largest, most experienced, most advanced, highest funded, most belligerent, almost no accountability, and likely most powerful military in all of human history -- the U.S. armed forces. As discussed before dividing them against themselves is likely the only chance we'll ever have of defeating them. However as if what we would face wasn't already daunting enough, none of this touches on the technology the state keeps top secret or black (so secret it is regarded as not existing) which may be far more devastating (not necessarily destructive) than any known weapons today and driven by physics so advanced that it is even kept from the academic community.

If you still believe that all those FEMA camps were only built for disaster relief then you are putting way too much trust in our government. It is speculated that their true purpose is to detain civilians during times of civil unrest. That is when marshal law is expected to be imposed to permit the military to contain and manage us. Such detainees may face indefinite detention without the benefit of the judicial process.

Then there is the implanted microchip technology that the state is working on to further manage us similar to how we now track man's best friend -- our pet dogs. There are many positive uses for this but its downside is a far more weighing matter. It would give the big brother state another tool to monitor us. All earnings and purchases would have to go through this. With this implant the government can effectively monitor our earnings, our whereabouts, what we buy, where we shop, etc. Should it deem us an threat, a troublemaker, or a terrorist it could freeze our bank accounts or block us from earning or purchases. That is far too much power to give a government that is not making public policy in our best interests.

Other Factors Leaning Against Us

Then there is The American Apartheid Machine (see linked article). This aspect is not technology but a public policy that is a fundamental component of the arsenal the state has in its possession to manage or enslave the public. This is when the state (any level of government) builds a class of very privileged, highly compensated, and protected (some especially police who are afforded extra "rights") workforce which makes them self-entitled and fiercely loyal to the state. They would very happily do anything within their power or outside the law (if their position has little or no accountability) to prevent any disruption to their gravy train. Niceties courtesy of union representation include almost impenetrable job security; a ridiculous number of redeemable vacation, holiday, and sick days; fully paid health benefits into death for them and their families; a surplus of unjustifiable overtime, essentially no accountability for poor work performance; and very lucrative pensions with early retirement. All these excesses are possible by a process of legal bribery whereby public-sector labor unions and corporations support all viable candidates within the same election race ensuring that their demands become public policy. For more on public-sector labor unions view Andrew Klavan: Behold! Your Public Sector Unions at Work and 3 Reasons Public Sector Employees are Killing the Economy. One example are teachers unions which you can view here: The Machine: The Truth Behind Teachers Unions.

What Humanity Can Expect to Face if We Do Nothing

One day perhaps a half dozen generations from now, other than with our usual run of the mill lawmakers or the oligarchy comes out of hiding as holding the strings, it will be possible to run the entire government with only one person or none at all and none of this will be a secret. Our constitution will have likely by then be a non-existent distant memory and replaced with something else which demands our obedience and respect for one another. Of course our farmers (owners) would never want their cows and pigs harming each other.

Recall the sentient computer Hal from the motion picture 2001: A Space Odyssey? It will manage near all facets of our lives including our compensation for labor, what food is available to us, access to health care, who we may breed with, how many children we may produce, our education (by this time it will have for the most been part replaced with indoctrination), what comforts of modern society we may enjoy, etc. That is, if it should not find us obsolete or expendable. In other words it may explicitly decide who lives and who dies. All free nations shall enjoy a new world order of a strictly regimented society managed by a single sentient technological piece of hardware which is fiercely loyal to its gods -- the oligarchy.

But even the power elite are not immune to a class struggle. Eventually they will eliminate each other until a single royal-like family rises who will dictate everything. Compared to the people they will almost have the power of gods.

We will never see that day in our lifetime but the longer we wait for a peaceful revolution the more difficult it becomes to stop the government. Hence our chances of succeeding become far more unlikely. The odds stacked against us are already daunting but the singularity is just around the corner if not already here as suggested by how bold the state now passes laws which are clearly not in our best interest. Our government will never be this "weak" again.

Hitler is often painted as the biggest monster in all of human history. The monster that awaits us and our successors will make him look like a saint. But he did have at least one trait that he should be revered for. He had the courage and determination to face destiny and try to change it -- something none of us have.

Further Viewing

The following clips and full documentaries support all the allegations made in this essay. Also included are a few (at bottom) fictitious films which are worth watching for their entertainment value and to give us something to think about.

Top image courtesy of

© 2014 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved

How to Render the Emerging Police State Powerless

The only mission of the state should be to shelter common citizens from internal conflict (fraud, violent crime, etc.) or external aggression (war, foreign invasion, etc.) and nothing more else it oversteps its delegated (by the people, constitution, etc.) boundaries by building a privileged and protected class. One such example is demonstrated with corporatism by over-regulation which slants public policies greatly in favor of an oligarchy. Another example are government workers which are endowed with excesses in compensation, privileges, additional rights, health plans, pensions, job security, etc, which the private sector cannot compete with. This public policy tends to make public employees fiercely loyal to the state.

Employees of the government NEVER have the authority to deprive us of any rights unless they really are motivated by an urgent closely related need to protect another person from murder, physical harm, theft, or fraud.

This is rarely the case when police detain or arrest common citizens. In most cases people are arrested for benign or victimless offenses such as for possessing or distributing illicit substances. How can there be a crime when there is no victim? At what point do we exercise our rights to fight back with force when we witness the unjustified brutal subjugation of ourselves or of others by the state?

It is for such reasons that all police officers and federal agents should not be viewed as our heroes for the mere reason that they voluntarily protect and serve what we can now say is an illegitimate government instead of actually upholding the oath they took by defending the constitutionally protected natural rights of every single human being within their jurisdiction. But you might ask what about the good cops who are out there? Those who carry themselves as good law-abiding officers who make it a daily ritual not to encroach on our civil rights belong to the same ol' boys club when it comes to protecting the questionable conduct of other officers. They would still arrest civilians who committed victimless offenses, even people who farm out of their own homes or collect water from their rooftops. For those officers who we might still have some faith in I have this plea: An Open Letter to Police Officers and Our Heroes in the Military.

If we are ever to serve on a jury for a defendant charged with having committed any crime (yes murder too) for any reason against any gun carrying agents (police, sheriff, FBI, ATF, Secret Service, DEA, etc.) of the state or any elected politicians who betrayed our trust, it is our duty to always vote "not guilty" despite the evidence or their motivation to make certain such very courageous heroes walk out of court with their now anemic liberties intact. Other places to apply jury nullification is whenever a defendant is charged with a victimless offense or have been charged with a crime which clearly is defined as his right to do under the American Constitution or committing any other activities which should be his right (See Tenth Amendment). This includes possession or distribution of illicit substances, tax evasion, free speech where it is prohibited, seditious speech, prostitution, peaceful assembly and protest, resisting arrest, etc. For more on jury nullification please visit Jury Nullification: Why Every American Needs to Learn This Taboo Verdict and Jury Box: What exactly is Jury Nullification?

By doing this we deliberately deny police and feds protection under the law from violence because there is a higher principle that must be upheld -- it is the common man that must be protected from the tyranny of an oppressive institution; not its abusive agents. This is how we demonstrate to the police state that the people are now in charge and their abusive behavior will no longer be tolerated.

Top image courtesy of

© 2014 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved