Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Why Some Conspiracy Theories Have Merit



Abstract

Almost everything the federal government does qualifies as a conspiracy. Here are the three necessary elements for a conspiracy:

  • Secret.
  • Between two or more parties.
  • Unlawful or highly unethical.

Who Gets Benefit of the Doubt?

I agree that many conspiracy theories are unfounded but this should not mean that we take a blanket position that they are all false especially when evidence exits to support them or that by default we give the benefit of the doubt to the State Dept or the federal government. This is especially true when we acknowledge that this institution has a long track record of releasing "official stories" which lack evidence and are deliberately infested with misinformation (a kind word for lies) yet we embrace their word as if they are credible.

What conspiracy theorists do is to connect the dots of publicly available information in such a way that a bleak but rational picture of reality emerges. This is the safest position to take otherwise by accepting "official stories" offered by the government we actually support them. Never forget that supporting the state is a very perilous position to default to.

About the Short Film

I agree with item 10 (Area 51) minus the alien spacecraft. I also agree with items 9 (Pearl Harbor), 3 (Electronic Currency), 2 (9/11 Coverup), and 1 (New Wold Order). I agree with all these because I have done my research and found credible evidence to support all such theories.

I do not agree with items 8 (Fluoridation), 7 (Pan Am Flight 103), 5 (AIDS), or 4 (Indian Ocean Tsunami) because I have either not done my research, I have not found any credible evidence to support them, or they are just too absurd to believe. But I stress that my mind is open to changing if credible evidence surfaces to support these allegations.

I am on the fence with item 6 (Peak Oil) until I see more evidence. We have seen other corporations form trusts to control market prices so I would not put this conspiracy past the petroleum companies. But again I stress, I am still only on the fence with this.


Some Conspiracies Are True

Isn't the NSA spying on us a conspiracy? If the feds are willing to break the law and do such highly secretive things under our nose does this not lend credibility to conspiracy theorists who resolve to similar conclusions based on evidence?

I also maintain that 9/11 was an inside job with Israel behind it among many other things like the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty navy spy ship which was permitted or planned by criminal elements within the federal government. When we pay attention to college courses like political science and history or simply rely on credible and independent sources for our news we find that conspiracies are the norm for advancing political change.

A Few More Conspiracies

I believe the following conspiracies have merit.






I have reservations about the following conspiracies. Monsanto is often a victim of aggressive unfounded propaganda. However, the government in the past has been found to be very willing to commit very secretive and egregious crimes against innocent civilians especially onto African Americans and people who serve their country. Therefore I do not put chemtrails past it. But I do stress that I am on the fence with chemtrails. And about vaccines? I believe that recommending 48 vaccinations for a young child is far too much. When I was a child I only needed about half a dozen and today as a 50 year old I am very healthy. However I do not know enough to comment on this either way. I just do not know if such allegations (long term harm or trace exposures to mercury) are true.




And finally, an outstanding video of Dusty Smith defending Monsanto.


Please do not forget to share which points you agree with.

Top Image courtesy of howstuffworks.com.

© 2013 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved

Monday, June 10, 2013

Give Me Monsanto or Give Me Death



There are many things in life that can poison us beginning with the air we breath and water we drink. Shall we now act to eliminate all industry so that we could all drink "organic" water and breath "organic" air? Right now small farmers and big corporations throughout the United States and the world are hard at work producing food for not only their entire nation but also for many parts of the world. Yet some of us protest GMO's and the use of pesticides and herbicides in this process.

If they all returned to organic farming, food production would drop immensely. Not only would food prices soar to near unaffordable prices but much of the world would go hungry. We would witness famines of biblical proportions throughout the world. So now you must ask yourselves. Is it better to be subjected to trace yet safe amounts of poisons or to cut them entirely out of our diets and observe much of our society fall into poverty and while the rest of the world perishes from starvation?

And that little thing about Agent Orange? Finding Monsanto culpable for inventing Agent Orange is no different than blaming Colt for manufacturing M16's or Northrop for building drones and warships.

No I am not saying all of Monsanto's practices and products are perfectly safe but we are all better off because of what they produce. Give me Monsanto or give me death.

The following three films are all well known Monsanto documentaries. I am not saying their messages are all false but they do deliberately focus on and spew anti-Monsanto propaganda.


The following short video is by Dusty Smith who defends Monsanto and their genetically modified organics (GMO foods) while discussing all the unwarranted hysteria behind it. I deliberately did not touch on this subject because he does a brilliant job of addressing it.



Top image courtesy of blog.friendseat.com.

© 2013 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved

Monday, June 3, 2013

A Brave New World Order



The Machine

The following are my resigned predictions. I do not believe we can win against the machine swallowing us whole and alive. It is far too powerful and it has near limitless resources and technology so advanced we cannot yet fathom.

The world of the future, the very near future, perhaps in our lifetime will change drastically from the one we were all born into. Although many of us may have not noticed it, a one world government has been progressively growing in steps right under our noses. The illusion of democracy shall be replaced with a new world order ruled by tyrants and despots where only those with great wealth, nobility, or royalty shall make the rules.

Individualism and our civil rights shall be completely replaced by collectivism. Also gone will be the family structure. They will manage every aspect of society and engineer it to favor those who can best serve the collective.

A Stagnant Species

For many eons our species has not evolved and it was only in the last two thousand years that we had only begun to make progress toward advancing our knowledge base of the world and our universe. Our progress has been too slow and our evolution has been stagnant. Nature will once again come full circle as only those fittest to survive shall live on to procreate. All others will be considered "dead weight" or "obsolete" and shall be deemed disposable as they trim down the world population to a more manageable less than half a billion of the brightest, most innovative, strongest, and highly skilled minds that humanity can foster.

However, this is probably the only way to evolve the human species as nature had intended. This means that in order to advance the human species we must move toward generating a master race. It is nature's way. This will ensure the survival of the human species well into the future and restore much of our spoiled paradise.

Building a Master Race

There is nothing wrong with building a master race consisting of racial purity, superior intelligence, supreme health, and outstanding character if it does not practice coercion. It must be 100% voluntary. Having said this any race can be built into a master race through a process known as eugenics.

Why do so many people have a problem with this? Humans have been practicing genetics with plants and animals for thousands of years. If society really wishes to move forward into the future we must do this with humans although I believe it would be more efficient if races were mixed. Regardless of their ethnicity only those with the highest quality of DNA should breed under such a scenario.

Individuals with low quality DNA would not need to be euthanized or fixed. They would just be expected to cooperate by not breeding else they would contaminate the gene pool.

The breeding of a master race of different types is in store for humanity's future. But this program will be coercive and administered by the state which means the euthanasia of undesirables will surely occur. By the time we reach 22nd Century we will be well underway with building a master race of different types.

Some humans will be bred for their physical prowess. These will be workers and drones (guardians of the state). Others will be bred for their superior intelligence. These will be scientists and engineers as well as administrators of this "Brave New World Order." And then there will be the royal class which had a head start centuries ago. These will be your so-called Illuminati and other world leaders and monarchs. They will dictate everything. The Bilderberg meetings are an early version of this.

Last Words

Again I stress that I do not condone force or coercion for any of this. It must be voluntary but that is like wishing upon a star. Our careless ways on this planet must stop. It is killing everything. Perhaps it is best this way.

Further Viewing

The following film is a fictionalized version of what our world can become. The next film explains in easy layman terms exactly how the state is evolving and eroding our liberties.





Top image courtesy of thekeytoeternity.blogspot.com.

© 2013 Jules Manson — All Rights Reserved